Skip to content
TrailblazerFabGet a Quote

Engineering Examples · Robotics & UAS hardware

Sizing drone landing gear to the landing, not the datasheet

A printed cantilever leg that absorbs a hard landing — with the factor of safety computed by the energy method, not asserted.

The result at a glance

1.90×
FoS at a 1.0 m/s hard landing
1.35×
FoS on a tilted 2-leg touchdown (no yield)
3.0 J
descent energy absorbed
0.00%
FEA equilibrium error (mesh valid)

Problem → built result

What we solved

Drone landing gear is the part everyone copies off a free STL and nobody analyzes. That's fine until a commercial aircraft — a survey or inspection rig carrying a gimbal worth more than the drone — comes down hard. A leg that cracks on a 1 m/s touchdown costs a re-fly, a possible gimbal strike, and a grounded job.…

What we built

Treat the leg as what it physically is: a cantilever spring. Model it parametrically — a mount pad, a tapered blade strut, a skid foot — solve it once under a reference load, and read its stiffness and its stress-per-newton from that one finite-element analysis.

Assembly render — Nylon-PA cantilever leg, set of four

How we proved it

The engineering behind the result.

Material matched to the duty, not the spec sheet

Landing gear is an impact-and-fatigue part, and that pair narrows the field hard. We print it in ASA, the UV-stable engineering polymer, because the gear lives outdoors in direct sun: unstabilized nylon yellows and loses its toughness, TPU is too soft for a structural leg, and PE…

The factor of safety is an output

At the rated 1.0 m/s hard landing each leg holds 1.90× inside the as-printed allowable. A tilted touchdown that drops the whole descent energy onto just two legs still holds 1.35× — no yield. Standing at rest the margin is 62×.…

Proof the model is real

The reactions balance the applied landing load to 0.00% — a wrong finite-element mesh can't satisfy equilibrium, so that's the mesh validating itself. An independent hand-calc of the leg's stiffness as an inclined cantilever agrees with the FEA to 29%.…

Landing-impact FEA — von Mises field under the energy-method peak ground reaction

Delivered result

Evidence a buyer can use.

A landing-gear leg that ships as a configurable product sized to the customer's aircraft, with the FEA that proves it survives the landing — not a traced STL with a hopeful weight on it. The honest gates travel with it: the rating is a single hard landing (repeated hard landings are a fatigue duty, which is why we offer a cyclic test), and the 1.0 m/s margin…

Application notes

The factor of safety is for a single hard landing. Repeated hard landings are a fatigue duty — The leg is ASA for outdoor UV stability, and we offer a cyclic-landing test rather than claim a life. These margins sit below our own impact-duty FoS floor (3–4×), so 1.0 m/s is a hard ceiling.…

Quote

Configure the Commercial Drone Landing Gear.

Photos, a drawing, or dimensions. We’ll quote the job if we can take it.